The Deir Yassin Remembered Blog

Report on Beth Israel vigil 05-21-11

Posted on May 28th, 2011 at 8:19 am by

We Have a Friend in Bibi

Benjamin Netanyahu (aka ‘Bibi’) delivered a speech at a joint session of Congress this Tuesday, where he received 29 standing ovations, compared to his president’s 25 for the State of the Union Address on January 24th (…and we thought he was OUR president). The reason that the peace community can thank Mr. Netanyahu is that he gave us the key to promote a just peace in Palestine. He exposed “Israel’s” vulnerable underbelly, its Achilles heel. He used the phrase “Jewish state” not once, not twice, but ten times during the speech. Double digits.

Bibi said “So why has peace not been achieved? Because so far, the Palestinians have been unwilling to accept a Palestinian state, if it meant accepting a Jewish state alongside it.”

Also, “Two years ago, I publicly committed to a solution of two states for two peoples: A Palestinian state alongside the Jewish state.”

He is telling us, if not fairly yelling, that opposition to Israel’s existence as a Jewish state will provide the solution to this ongoing genocide in the most effective manner. He implied, “Here is the hammer with which to hit us,” and lays it at our feet. He claims “Israel” has a right to exist as a Jewish state, and Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends says not just “No”, but “Hell, No!” in response. What right do Jews have to forcibly terrorize and displace – permanently, according to Bibi – millions of Palestinians? By what right may Jews claim superiority over the oppressed Muslims and Christians under their control? By what right does the Jewish state allow Jews to roam the Old City with machine guns, and shoot down 13-year-old girls with impunity? And by what right can “Israel” define its own existence as a Jewish state (ref: Declaration of Statehood, May 14, 1948)

Who Will Join Us?

A local Quaker Friend has compiled a list of twenty-four local groups purportedly working for peace in Palestine. As her letter to the Ann Arbor News of December 16, 2007 informs us, she received this list from Megiddo Peace Project’s Alan Haber.

JWPF would like to know which of these groups will choose to differentiate themselves from Bibi’s demand of Palestinians that they accept “Israel’s” right to exist as a Jewish state in Palestine? We asked that question of Mazin Qumsiyeh in March (Report on Beth Israel vigil 03-12-11) and noted his firm response was “nonsense!”. Will, for instance, Jewish Voice for Peace – Detroit Chapter, agree with Dr. Qumsiyeh in their claimed solidarity with Palestinians, or will they, in complicit silence, agree with Mr. Netanyahu that “Israel” can maintain this nonsensical “right” to exist as a Jewish state? ICPJ’s Common Ground group: will you speak clearly with one voice and at least challenge Bibi, and all other racist Zionists who support this “right?”

National Jewish-led peace groups, such as Code Pink, Women in Black, the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network, Middle East Children’s Alliance, etc. can also voice their opinion in a timely manner. They can clearly state that Israel has NO right to exist as a Jewish state, they can refute Netanyahu’s demand of Palestinians, and show a spineless Congress the way. Will they?

Here are the twenty-four groups listed by our Friend (Reader quiz: Can you name the group that’s conspicuously missing from her list?):

1. American Friends of Peace Now: www.peacenow.org/
2. Beth Emeth Social Action Committee
3. Beth Israel Social Action Committee
4. Brit T’zedek v Shalom: www.btvshalom.org/
5. Common Ground: Israel/Palestine – Interfaith Council for Peace & Justice
6. Evangelical Lutheran SE Michigan Middle East Taskforce
7. First Baptist Morikawa Conference Committee
8. First United Methodist Global Issues and Methodist Women United
9. Friends of Neve Shalom/Wahat al Salaam: www.oasisofpeace.org/
10. Friends of Rabbis for Human Rights: www.rhr-na.org/
11. Friends of Sabeel/Ann Arbor (The Voice of the Palestinian Christians): www.fosna.org
12. Gate to Humanity: adam-insan.org.il/eng_index .htm
13. InterDenominational Advocates for Peace (IDAP)
14. Jewish Voice for Peace Detroit Area Chapter: www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/
15. Megiddo Peace Project: www.umich.edu/~megiddo/
16. Michigan Peaceworks: www.justpeaceinfo.org/
17. Middle East Film Society
18. Palestine Aid Society: www.palestineaidsociety.org/
19. Palestine-Israel Action Group: www.piag.quaker.org/
20. Pilgrims of Ibillin (Fr. Elias Chacour), First Presbyterian: www.pilgrimsofibillin.org/
21. Students Allied for Freedom and Equality (SAFE): www.umsafe.blogspot.com
22. Unitarian-Universalists for Justice in the Middle East: www.uujme.org
23. Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom-Middle East Committee: www.wilpf.org
24. Zeitouna: www.zeitounamovie.org/

Submit your comments on this report to
https://blog.deiryassin.org/2011/05/27/report-on-beth…vigil-03-21-11/

Eight Vigilers, including a “young” one-timer
Remember the USS Liberty
Henry Herskovitz
Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends
#

Report on Beth Israel vigil 05-14-11

Posted on May 21st, 2011 at 7:42 am by

Watch the Belly Button, Not the Ball

For those now singing the praises of Barack Obama’s call for a “two-state” solution based on the Jewish state’s return to the 1967 borders, “with mutually agreed swaps”,
we remind them of the basketball defense drills drummed into youngsters as they learn to play the sport. The offensive player may move the ball left, right, up, down. He may cast his eyes to and fro as he suggests the pattern he might run. He may swing his arms and hands wildly as a distraction and challenge for the defensive player assigned to watch him. If the offensive player can get the defensive man to “buy the fake”, he will have succeeded in clearing his path to the basket. But the astute defensive player knows that if he focuses on the offensive player’s belly button, that, and only that will determine where his opponent will be headed. All other movements are superfluous, and should mentally be discarded.

And so it is with Mr. Obama’s call for an Apartheid solution to an apartheid problem, aka the “Two State Solution”. Apartheid, you will recall, was White supremacist South Africa’s ‘two-state solution’ – homelands, or “bantustans” for the Black Majority with most of the land reserved for a White state. The belly button in his case is Obama’s willingness to stop U.S. aid to this racist state. When he calls for the termination of financial support of “Israel”, when he promises to veto the blank checks now routinely issued by Congress, when he clearly states that a Jewish state and a democratic state are mutually exclusive, then and only then will we see the belly button move. And we will know that the “audacity of hope” has real meaning beyond campaign rhetoric.

Here are some of the President’s words:

“For too long, the citizens of the Middle East have lived in the midst of death and fear… For the sake of all humanity, things must change in the Middle East.

“It is untenable for Israeli citizens to live in terror. It is untenable for Palestinians to live in squalor and occupation. And the current situation offers no prospect that life will improve.

“In the [current] situation the Palestinian people will grow more and more miserable. My vision is two states, living side by side in peace and security.

“The final borders, the capital and other aspects of this [Palestinian] state’s sovereignty will be negotiated between the parties, as part of a final settlement.”

Good words for belly-button watchers. Because these words were not spoken by Barack Obama, but were uttered by President George H. Bush, reported by the Guardian newspaper on June 25, 2002. And those of us unwilling to learn from the mistakes of history are condemned to repeat them.

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~hersko/Photos/Israels%20Bitch.jpg

Vineyard Church to Meet with JWPF Members

The Rev. Ken Wilson has agreed to meet with this writer plus an additional representative from Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends, at our scheduled coffee klatch on June 22nd. Stay tuned…

Send comments to

https://blog.deiryassin.org/2011/05/20/report-on-beth…vigil-05-14-11/

8 Vigilers, plus two mystery guests …
Boycott “Israel”
Henry Herskovitz
Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends
#

Report on Beth Israel vigil 05-07-11

Posted on May 15th, 2011 at 7:54 pm by

JWPF Acknowledged by Vineyard Church

Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends is in receipt of an email from the Rev. Ken Wilson of the Vineyard Church Ann Arbor in which the pastor expresses sympathy for the congregants of Beth Israel, and Rabbi Rob Dobrusin as they “endure” our silent, non-violent and seven year old vigils. The transcribed email is presented below signature, and may contain typographical errors. Although he did not contact us in advance of sending his email, Ken has accepted this writer’s invitation to get together, and has offered a June 22nd date to have coffee with him and his associate pastor Donnell Wyche.

Hopefully we will be able to share with Ken some errors and misconceptions revealed in his letter. For instance, he implies that love is the true path to understanding, yet he does not seem to understand that it’s our love for peace, justice, and the many Palestinians we have come to know that drives our weekly vigils. Implementation of Zionist ideology might be a zero-sum game, but the capacity for love is not.

And it should be pointed out to Ken that he implicitly argues *for* our vigils when he says, “One might picket a Russian Orthodox parish over the policies of the Russian government in Chechnya.” Perhaps if his church in question publicly touted its support for Russian occupation and control of Chechnya, flew a Russian flag in its sanctuary, prayed for the state of Russia, took its children there to pose with Russian soldiers on military vehicles, then that parish – like Beth Israel Congregation – might just be a proper venue for protest. Especially if that Church supported a Russian (Orthodox) Lobby which dominated US foreign policy concerning the Caucasus region the way the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee and other parts of the Israel lobby dominate US foreign policy concerning the Middle East.

Invoking the name of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is yet another double-edged sword that Ken raises. It could be argued that churches much like the silent Vineyard Church were the object of complaint aired by Dr. King in his “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”, in which he writes to his fellow clergymen:

But I must confess that I am not afraid of the word “tension.” I have earnestly opposed violent tension, but there is a type of constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth. Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half truths to the unfettered realm of creative analysis and objective appraisal, so must we see the need for nonviolent gadflies to create the kind of tension in society that will help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism to the majestic heights of understanding

JWPF hopes that as Pastor Wilson encourages his congregants to attend Beth Israel services, that he also includes an invitation to come and speak with us as they enter the synagogue. We stand ready to discuss our group with them, and of course always ready to discuss Israeli atrocities, which occur on a daily basis.

Wonder Where the Anti-War Movement Went?

Black Agenda Report Glen Ford reports on a study that confirms what local peace protesters have known intuitively for two and a half years — The election of a Democratic president (not peace) was the goal of many peace activists and organizations. Locally, one need only recall Michigan Peaceworks’ plea for “Jobs, Not War, in 2004”, a close echo of the DNC call. Michigan Peaceworks openly courted US Congressman John Dingell, Ann Arbor Mayor John Hieftje, and had arch Zionist City Councilwoman Joan Lowenstein address a peace rally on the University of Michigan campus. Talk about the fox guarding the henhouse!

Ford writes: “The U.S, anti-war movement was always a lot less than it appeared to be. At its height, activists claimed that the sheer weight of visible public opinion would shake power relationships to the very foundation. But it turned out that many of the anti-war legions were actually comprised of partisan Democrats who only opposed Republican wars. ‘For the phony anti-warrior, imperialism with a Democratic face is just fine.'”

Michigan residents need only witness the recent outrage in Benton Harbor against newly elected (Republican) Governor Rick Snyder as he installs Emergency Financial Managers to dismember the city, but never witnessed such protests against outgoing (Democratic) Governor Jennifer Granholm, while she was setting the table for Governor Rick. See “The Phony Anti-War Movement” by Glen Ford.

 

Six Vigilers asking
With “Allies” like Israel, Who Needs Enemies?
Henry Herskovitz
Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends

Send comments to:
https://blog.deiryassin.org/2011/05/15/report-on-beth…vigil-05-07-11/
#

[email message sent to the congregation of Vineyard Church of Ann Arbor, by senior pastor Ken Wilson, March 2011]

Greetings,

Today I’d like to offer my reflections on the protests being endured weekly by Congregation Beth Israel in Ann Arbor.

What’s my interest in this, you might ask? It’s a personal concern to me because I’ve come to greatly respect Rabbi Rob Dobrusin, who leads the Beth Israel Congregation (part of the Conservative movement within Judaism.) We met as participants in the Inter-faith Roundtable, which affords faith leaders in town a chance to meet each other and learn about the various religious expressions in our community.

Congregation Beth Israel has been picketed by a small group of protesters during their Sabbath observance, most every Saturday for the past seven years. I drive past the protesters on my way in to church on Saturdays. I’ve often thought “How would we respond as a congregation if something like that happened to us?”

The small group of picketers displays signs protesting the plight of the Palestinian people. By powerful inference their presence at Beth Israel asserts that this congregation supports the injustices decried. Can you imagine the implied insult to the congregants who realize that anything pertaining to the Middle East requires a respectful conversation, not placard sized assertions which are a mere fraction of a tweet? Concern for the Palestinian people is, of course, a very legitimate concern. But the group has targeted the Sabbath services of Beth Israel to stage their protest – and this raises questions about the nature of protest and the kind of community we want to be.

It appears that the picketers have a constitutional right to picket any place of worship. But the rule of [law] is not the rule of love. In these times of intense cultural conflict, if more of us engaged in there kinks of protests, would our community be better off? Would the cause of justice be well served? Would love prevail? Would the kingdom of heaven come any closer to earth?

In particular, do we want to be the kind of community in which those who practice their faith in weekly worship are subjected to such protests?

Let’s face it: virtually every religious congregation could be the target of such a protest. One might picket an Episcopal church with its ties to the Church of England (headed by the Queen of England) to protest the British occupation forces in Northern Ireland. One might picket a Russian Orthodox parish over the policies of the Russian government in Chechnya. One might picket any religious congregation over its position on legalized abortion, gay marriage, immigration reform, or a host of other issues.

This might provide a platform for one’s message and would be perfectly legal. But is this the kind of community we want to be?

I grew up with great admiration for the protest marches of the Civil Rights movement. This protest was led by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. whose views on civil disobedience as a form of protest were inspired by Gandhi who in turn drew inspiration from Jesus of Nazareth. In this movement, the protestors understood that they gained a kind of moral authority by putting their own lives at risk – by sitting in the front of a segregated bus, drinking from the wrong water fountain, or standing firm in the face of police attack dogs.

I have personally met Palestinian Christians (often joined by their Jewish and Muslim neighbors) who practice civil disobedience in their homeland to protest settlements encroaching on their neighbors’ land. In doing so, they place themselves in harm’s way and incur considerable personal risk. One of these leaders spoke very movingly at one of our Vineyard National Leaders conferences a few years ago. He told of leaving for a weekly protest each Friday after his wife prayed for his safety with tears in her eyes and fear for his life. In the tradition of Martin Luther King, such protests send a powerful message, a message that is designed to win the hearts of the people whose actions are being protested.

Within this tradition of protest, simply having a legitimate concern or speaking up for the oppressed or against injustice doesn’t confer moral legitimacy. The protest includes a prophetic dimension aimed at affirming the common humanity of the oppressor and the oppressed. The protester places him/herself in a position of vulnerability to the oppressor, imitating the vulnerable God of the Bible, revealed in both the Hebrew Scriptures (Torah and Prophets) and the New Testament. This identification with the vulnerability of God is the prophetic source of the protest’s power.

In the past, I have participated in protests that, on further reflection, didn’t adequately share in this prophetic dimension, so I felt led by conscience to discontinue my participation.

The times invite us to reflect on the nature of the public discourse in our society. Our media amplify voices of protest: the angrier the voice, the higher the ratings. We reward this with our media consumption habits,. The implicit message (often the most powerful part of any communication seems to be: Hey, if your cause is just, that’s justification enough to say whatever you want. I recently heard a radio talk show host going off on one o his political opponents, “She is a hater … and I detest her!” completely oblivious to the irony if his assertion. There is something toxic at work in our public discourse these days.

Let’s reflect on our own public discourse: Is it time for us all to step back from the “rightness” of our convictions to examine the impact of the way we express our convictions? We can be absolutely right and absolutely miss the mark of love, which is the heart of God.

It’s no picnic going to your place of public worship to be greeted by protesters carrying signs. How would we respond if we were the congregation being picketed week after week? I would hope that we would respond as Beth Israel has responded. As one of the pastors of the Ann Arbor Vineyard, I would hope that I would be able to lead as I’ve seen Rabbi Dobrusin lead his congregation: with humanity, warmth and grace, informed by the wisdom of his tradition.

We recently completed a series titled, Love Loves, focused on a powerful text from the Book of Leviticus (19:18): “Love you neighbor as yourself” – a text highlighted by Jesus and the apostles as the guiding principle of biblical interpretation: “Do unto others as you would have them do to you: this is the Law & the Prophets!” (Mt. 7:12); and “For the entire law is fulfilled in keeping this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself” (Gal. 5:14).

How might we love our neighbors at Beth Israel? If we were the congregation being picketed by a small group of protesters Sunday after Sunday, wouldn’t it be encouraging simply to be remembered by an occasional visit from the members of other faith communities? Just to say “We admire how you’re handling this, and want to share this burden with you today”

If you would like to arrange for a supportive visit like this simply email me [mailto:seniorpastor@Annarborvineyard.org] and we’ll set up a schedule for a monthly visit, at times that would be supportive to Beth Israel.

I know that many of you have a heart to be good neighbors in this way. Perhaps we could set a rotation to cover the next year. Twelve people each visiting once in the next year would take care of it.

After all, we follow one who faithfully attended his hometown synagogue – a place where the Torah and the Prophets are read and revered and commented on. We’d all no doubt be better off for such a visit. We can’t make these protests stop. But we can love our neighbors at Beth Israel, walking in the way of the revelation of God to Moses: I am with you; you are not alone.

Love,
Ken
#

Report on Beth Israel vigil 04-30-11

Posted on May 8th, 2011 at 9:59 am by

Al-Awda Conference

About 150 people took part in the Ninth Annual International Convention of Al-Awda, the Palestine Right to Return Coalition, in Anaheim, California last week. Three representatives from Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends participated. In view of our Nobel Peace Prize-winning President’s Moe Greene Special -style assassination of Osama bin Laden, this writer took note of the words of speaker Jamal Nasser. Dr. Nasser explained the deep embarrassment, and humiliation felt by the Arab world upon “seeing an Arab leader [Saddam Hussein] whether they liked him or not – hanged by an invading foreign power.” And he implied that this humiliation and subsequent anger would follow an American arrogance which militarily does as it pleases throughout the world, conducts extra-judicial killings as it preaches “Democracy” to others. As a sign of hope, however, Dr. Nasser confessed he was “born again – as an Egyptian – ” on January 25th of this year.

Ali Abunimah described reading the Palestine Papers – released by Clayton Swisher of Al-Jazeera – and concluded that “the whole Oslo regime is corrupt and collapsing.” He described his shock upon reading that the Palestinian Authority received Israel’s Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi as an honored guest at the same time Israel was assassinating Hamas leaders. “These problems cannot be solved by PA elections”, he said.

Boycotts Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) were discussed in a breakout session, where it was remarked that Israel feels more of an “existential threat” from BDS than it does from an alleged nuclear threat from Iran.

Dr. Salman Abu Sitta had the last word of the conference and gave this writer hope that some in Al-Awda were cognizant of the effect of Jewish power on the Palestinians. He listed more than a few embarrassing statements issued by Israeli rabbis on the topic of Jewish supremacism. Most participants, however, seemed willing to shield the Jewish community from criticism. One Palestinian woman thought the “No Jewish State” t-shirt worn by this writer should read “No Zionist State”, but changed her mind when reminded that no Christian Zionist was entitled as a right to become a citizen of the Jewish state.

Article Published by Intifada – Voice of Palestine

Elias Harb, editor of Intifada – Voice of Palestine, met this writer at the conference and has just re-published our article, “The Role of Jews in the Palestine Solidarity Movement”, including a rather attractive layout. Link here to view.

Gatekeeper Norman Finkelstein

Last week we reported how Jews in the Palestine solidarity movement serve as shields for criticism of the Jewish community. Peacemonger takes issue with Dr. Norman Finkelstein’s book, This Time We’ve Gone Too Far, and describes how he massages and spins poll data to conclude that American Jewish support of Israel is waning. Rather than describe Israel’s attacks of 2008-2009 on the world’s largest concentration camp (Gaza) as the Hanukkah Massacre, Finkelstein refers to a “recent military action that Israel took in Gaza” and shields from his readers the fact that fully 75% of American Jews supported that criminal invasion. Read more at http://zionistsout.blogspot.com/2011/05/not-far-enough-fact-checking.html

Five Vigilers
End Jewish Supremacism in Palestine
Henry Herskovitz
Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends
Submit comments at https://blog.deiryassin.org/2011/05/08/report-on-beth…vigil-04-30-11/
#

Report on Beth Israel vigil 04-23-11

Posted on April 27th, 2011 at 2:41 pm by

 

Counterpunch: The Role of Jews in the Palestine Solidarity Movement

In our report of February 5, 2011 we detailed a talk given by this writer in Seattle. At the suggestion of salon-host Ibrahim, we have provided a written description of that talk, and on-line newsmagazine Counterpunch has selected it for publication. Other websites have echoed the article:

April 26, 2011

Taking the Cause of Justice Back to the Jewish People

The Role of Jews in the Palestinian Solidarity Movement

By HENRY HERSKOVITZ
and MICHELLE J. KINNUCAN

After Malcolm X returned from his epiphanic trip to Mecca, he was asked if White people could join his Organization of Afro-American Unity. He was very clear in his response:

“They can’t join us. I have these very deep feelings that white people who want to join black organizations are really just taking the escapist way to salve their consciences. By visibly hovering near us, they are ‘proving’ that they are ‘with us’. But the hard truth is this isn’t helping to solve America’s racist problem. The Negroes aren’t the racists. Where the really sincere white people have got to do their ‘proving’ of themselves is not among the black victims, but out there on the battle lines of where America’s racism really is – and that’s in their own home communities.” The Autobiography of Malcolm X, pp 383-384, emphasis in original.

He added that by working separately, Whites and Blacks would form a successful collective. “Working separately, the sincere white people and the sincere black people actually will be working together.”

The words of this fighter for justice are valid 46 years later in another context: Defining the role of Jews in the Palestine solidarity movement. The lesson is that sincere Jews should not play leading roles in the Palestinian solidarity movement, but should instead expose and challenge the racism that exists in their own Jewish communities. So what are Jewish-led and Jewish-identified groups and leaders doing? Certainly, they criticize atrocities committed by Israel in the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem, but are they clearly defining their positions? Do they oppose Jewish supremacism, as some opposed White supremacism in South Africa during the 1980s? Which of the higher profile Jewish-led and Jewish-identified groups are demanding an end to a Jewish state and full and immediate return for displaced Palestinians and their descendents?

With the possible exception of the Neturei Karta rabbis, they don’t exist. Following Malcolm X, Jews have predictably ingratiated themselves into some Palestinian organizations, have created “dialogue” groups between Jews and Palestinians (where the elephant of who’s oppressing whom is conveniently ignored), have spoken clearly against Christian Zionism, but where are their voices challenging Judaic Zionism? After all, it’s “their own home community”.

Why is it that our group, Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends, standing in front of an avowedly Zionist synagogue in Ann Arbor, Michigan for over seven years, remains the only Jewish-founded and Jewish-led group that openly and explicitly challenges Jewish power, here and in Palestine? Why is there a list of over forty Jewish peace activists who refuse to stand with us and against the racism so deeply rooted in their own community? What are they in the game for?

Proportionately and in dollars spent, votes coerced, degree of dedication and organization, no other community supports Israel more strongly than the Jewish community. Perhaps a case might be made that Christian Zionists are more numerous, but they follow the lead of Jewish Zionists; strong Jewish-led anti-Zionist campaigns focused on the Jewish community would help empower more Christians to challenge Christian Zionism. Also, Christian Zionists are dwarfed by the political footprint of the Jewish organizations comprising the “Israel Lobby”. In short, the Jewish community’s worthiness and appropriateness as a target for criticism and concerted anti-Zionist organizing is as clear as it is confounding that more Jews don’t take on this vital task.

This writer joined the steering committee of a local peace group shortly after the attacks of 9/11 and was continuously frustrated that attempts to place Palestine on the table for discussion and action were swept off. This in spite of the fact that US support for Israel was one of three major reasons the attacks were purportedly launched. The Jewish leaders of this peace group could not countenance harsh criticisms of Israel, and when membership overwhelmingly (78 per cent in favor) supported a resolution calling for an end to military aid, the leadership eventually terminated the membership and reorganized Michigan Peaceworks as a Director-led 501(c)(3) organization.

Personal experiences like the above suggest a pattern: Jews become peace activists, but when the realization strikes that they must choose between the mutually exclusive constructs of a Jewish state and a just peace, these activists move into gate-keeper mode. Like Monty Python’s Black Knight, they cry “None shall pass” to those of us who call for the peaceful dismantlement of the Jewish state. Our voices are marginalized, and by the very same folks who should be joining us.

After all, who better than Jewish activists to challenge the Jewish community? Personal discussions with Christian activists indicate that all-too-many are terrified of being labeled an “anti-Semite”. Terrified to the point of inaction, at best. They look to Charles Freeman, Arun Gandhi, Helen Thomas, and Will Smith as examples of what could happen to them should they speak truthfully.

This sets the stage for true peace activism from Jews in the movement: The racist nature of the Jewish state is fostered in local, American Jewish communities. As an example, the rabbi at Beth Israel Congregation, where we protest every Saturday, confirmed in the local newspaper that his congregation is unabashedly Zionist: “there is one general statement which I can make on behalf of the congregation – Beth Israel Congregation affirms without any hesitation or equivocation the legitimacy of the existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish state”. According to its website, Beth Israel proudly stood with Israel as it battered Lebanon in 2006. Children from Beth Israel are taken on trips to Israel where they are posed with armed IDF soldiers and in front of military vehicles. In short, Zionist indoctrination and support for Israel are staples in the religious life of that congregation.

The unwillingness of many Jewish activists and organizations to confront the local roots of violent Jewish supremacism foisted upon the indigenous people of Palestine is shocking and inexcusable. It would be clear to Malcolm X, were he to return to us today. He would most likely have harsh words to Jewish peace activists who do not hold their own community accountable for the support they give the Jewish state, much like he had for Whites who refused to expose the racism in the White community.

The solution to Jewish supremacism in Palestine is simple: End it. Demand of Jews in the peace movement that they stop yelling only about a 1967 “occupation”, and start condemning the creation and maintenance of a Jewish supremacist state imposed by force upon an unwilling and incredibly resilient native population in 1948. This was the culmination of a Jewish movement started decades earlier. Taking the cause of justice and peace back to the Jewish community is the most valid path forward for Jews supporting an end to the racism both in Palestine and in their own community.

 

Henry Herskovitz is a retired Mechanical Engineer, and became a peace activist after witnessing the effects of US-led sanctions against Iraq in 2000. He founded Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends, a group in Ann Arbor that has held non-violent vigils at Beth Israel Congregation for over seven years. He’s worked with the International Solidarity Movement as well as the Michigan Peace Team in Palestine. Contact: http://www.facebook.com/people/Henry-Herskovitz/627467402

Michelle J. Kinnucan’s writing has previously appeared in CommonDreams.org, Palestine Chronicle, Arab American News, Electronic Intifada, Veterans Today and elsewhere. Her 2004 investigative report on the Global Intelligence Working Group was featured in Censored 2005: The Top 25 Censored Stories (Seven Stories Pr., 2004) and she contributed a chapter to Finding the Force of the Star Wars Franchise (Peter Lang, 2006). Click here for her contact information.

Al-Awda Convention This Weekend

Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends will maintain our presence at Beth Israel Congregation despite two MIA members. Hopefully, next week’s report will describe events in Anaheim. For details about the convention, please visit: http://al-awda.org/convention9/index.html

Comments on this report may be submitted at https://blog.deiryassin.org/?p=471

Eight Vigilers
No Jewish State
Henry Herskovitz
Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends
#

Report on Beth Israel vigil 04-16-11

Posted on April 24th, 2011 at 10:23 pm by

 

Jewish Federation: Vigils Still Relevant

In his Sabbath address to the Jewish community in Ann Arbor, Jewish Federation President David Shtulman writes “If Terry Jones Protested at a Synagogue“. Once again a local Jewish leader (it was Rabbi Dobrusin the last time, see: Rabbi Dorbrusin Hijacks Religious Freedom Day Panel) feigns sympathy with their “brothers” in the Muslim community only long enough to assert their own, unique Jewish suffering. Very reminiscent of a deceased Aunt, who cried “What about the Jews?” when informed that her nephew was about to give a public talk on the devastating effects of US sanctions on the children of Iraq (May, 2000).

The heart of Shtulman’s lament is that the Dearborn, Michigan community mobilized to protest Terry Jones’ visit, and he wishes that the Ann Arbor community would do likewise to our vigils. He writes “There is nothing illegal about the weekly pickets outside of Beth Israel Congregation. If there was, the pickets would not be continuing after seven years. But the actions against Terry Jones show that there are still things a caring community can do.”

Perhaps Shtulman wishes the Ann Arbor community would trample the First Amendment the way Wayne County and Dearborn city officials did by briefly jailing Terry Jones and denying him his ability to hold a rally. Shtulman writes that symbolic gestures from City government and an interfaith coalition would make a statement that would “destroy any illusions the [vigilers] may hold about having the support of the ‘silent majority.'”

David should pause and evaluate his own words here, because he must realize that after seven years of holding peaceful protests at Beth Israel Congregation, the wider Ann Arbor community has yet to mount any campaign against our exercise of First Amendment rights similar to what occurred in Dearborn. Maybe he should have attended our Forum last month to question his assumption that the we don’t enjoy a high level of support from the general public. Maybe he should admit that efforts to create any pressure from city government or the interfaith community have been mainly orchestrated by Beth Israel and the Federation itself.

David and Beth Israel Congregation might also do well to heed the words of Osama Siblani, editor of the Arab American News and quoted in the Detroit Free Press: “’We come here today not as Christians, not as Muslims, not as Jews, but as Americans,’ said Osama Sablani, publisher of the Dearborn-based Arab American News and coordinator of the event. ‘We have only one flag and it is the American flag.’” Ouch! Doesn’t Mr. Siblani know that, unlike the mosques in Dearborn and Ann Arbor, Beth Israel flies two flags, and shows a preference to the one with a Jewish star in the middle?

Once again we extend our hand to David, and the rest of the Jewish community, to observe our vigils first hand, to join us and to halt support for a Zionist project that will never bring peace to either Jews or to Palestine.

Al-Awda Convention Next Week

Two members of Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends plan to attend the Ninth Al-Awda (Right of Return) convention which will be held in Anaheim, California. These are very exciting times, and this writer notes especially the refusals of Palestinians like speaker Ali Abunimah to buckle under to a Zionist-led, UN-approved “creation” of a fantasy Palestinian state.

And a quiz for our readers. Identify the nugget of importance in the speaker list for the Al-Awda convention, and win a valuable prize:

Dr. Salman Abu Sitta
Hugh Lanning
Ahmed Shawki
Ali Abunimah
Laila Al-Arian
Dr. Jamal Nassar
Rim Banna
Najat El-Khairy
Remi Kenazi
Hala Gabriel
Dr. Paul Larudee
Dr. Sunaina Maira
Michael Shehadeh
Ziad Abbas

 

Nine Vigilers on April 9th
Seven Vigilers on April 16th
(No report issued for 04-09-11)
We Remember Deir Yassin
Henry Herskovitz
Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends
#

Report on Beth Israel vigil 04-02-11

Posted on April 11th, 2011 at 1:14 pm by

 

Two “Off-Topic” Messages

Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends sees clear linkages between the financially-ailing State of Michigan and a US foreign policy that sends our taxes to support Israeli Apartheid. We took this message to the “We Are One” protest on the University of Michigan campus this week. The protest focused on Governor Rick Snyder’s plans to initiate new taxes, cut education spending and attack collective bargaining rights.

A concise flier was welcomed by the few attendees who understood the connection:

Keep Michigan Solvent
Stop US Aid to Israel
Stop supporting genocide
Bring our money back home
$58 Million saved for Michigan, plus millions more for wars we launch for Israel.
Read “A War for Israel” from ifAmericansKnew.org

Concurrent with our efforts to raise awareness of US funding of a foreign entity committing genocide against an innocent, indigenous people, was our friend Arny and his one-person, anti-war protest. Arny is a Veteran For Peace member and his “off-topic” message was “War is Costly”, while holding the VFP peace flag. Good for Arny. Though this was not an anti-war protest, his message is always relevant and timely. Same as ours.

Arny reports receiving much support for his efforts to link war with an out-of-control military budget and its effects on states as Michigan. But our efforts to link a minority-influenced, and dangerous foreign policy budget prompted a handful of derisive comments, including two attempts at physical intimidation.

Why the difference in reactions? Both messages were “off-topic” in the sense that they didn’t directly address unions, teacher rights, Tea Party influence, state taxes, etc. but both were clearly “on-topic” to address underlying causes of economic distress. Our sign read “Economic Stimulus: Stop US Aid to Israel!”

Could it be that a general anti-war message is less threatening than a message critical of the Jewish state? How does the fact that Ann Arbor’s Jewish population is proportionately six times greater than that of the US average influence the response to our message? Is the non-Jewish population media-sensitized to favor Israel and to cast Jews as victims, forever requiring protection?

Notable at this rally were the presence of the United Auto Workers and Teamsters members and speakers. Both unions have purchased Israel government bonds as part of their pension funding plans, and we have it on good grounds that the hijacking of organized labor was influenced by the actions of the Jewish Zionist Samuel Gompers.

Two “off-topic” messages. One is supported, the other given a hard time. If our reasoning doesn’t provide the answers, please provide some that do at https://blog.deiryassin.org/?p=460

More on the Costs of US Support of Israel

Vigil supporter M. provides us a reminder of the work of Dr. Thomas R. Stauffer, an engineer and economist, who taught at Harvard and Georgetown universities. In 2003, the journal Middle East Policy published Dr. Stauffer’s article, “The cost of Middle East conflict, 1956-2002: what the U.S. has spent.” At the conclusion of this copiously annotated 58-page article Dr. Stauffer writes, “I have attempted to estimate the cost to the United States of the instability and conflict in the Middle East. The minimum estimate comes close to $3 trillion, an amount almost four times greater than the cost of the Vietnam War (reckoned in 2002 dollars). Even this figure underestimates the costs.…”

Vigils “Un-Islamic”? A Contextual Analysis

Last week’s report expressed our opinion on the offered Qur’an verse which attempted to explain Imam Dawud Walid’s remark that our vigils are “Un-Islamic”. This week we provide yet a third voice into the discussion:

The context of 6:108 [“And (O Believers), do not revile those whom they invoke besides Allah lest they should, in their ignorance, revile Allah.”] is entirely unrelated to the vigils. According to Ibn Kathir, one of the foremost commentators on the Qur’an, the verse refers to an incident in which Mecca’s polytheists engaged in discussion with Prophet Muhammad’s uncle, Abu Talib. There was a specific threat by Mecca’s polytheists to insult God if the prophet were to insult their idols. Hence, the verse is to be distinguished from the vigils in the following regards: 1) The synagogue has not made any threats to insult God if the vigils were to continue; 2) The synagogue is attended by Jews, who are monotheists. It is antithetical to their Judaism to verbally insult God, unlike the polytheists referred to in the verse; 3) The verse discourages offending others’ gods/idols. The vigils are about confronting an injustice, not offending anyone’s god. Therefore, the verse is entirely inapplicable to JWPF.

Eleven Vigilers
Jewish state or a Just Peace – our choice
Henry Herskovitz
Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends

deiryassin.org
Powered by WordPress. Theme developed with WordPress Theme Generator.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
%d bloggers like this: