Rabbi Dobrusin Hijacks Religious Freedom Day Panel
Sensing a setup, twelve members and supporters of Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends attended a panel discussion on Religious Freedom Day. And while some of us, including this writer, anticipated that panelist Rabbi Rob Dobrusin would merely hint at our vigils in front of his synagogue, we were mistaken. He utilized all his allotted time to bash our non-violent, silent and very effective vigils, while neither we, nor our supporters were permitted a single chance at rebuttal. This must have been particularly galling to the ACLU panel member, who rightly advocated free speech, and more free speech.
PeaceMonger listened to the recorded words of Rabbi Dobrusin, and has provided us with an exceptional analysis of his presentation. PM’s full report is reprinted after signature, and readers can follow the link to it here. It begins:
Inspired by incidents of anti-Muslim violence, it was billed as part of celebrating Religious Freedom Day but Rabbi Robert Dobrusin of Beth Israel Congregation (BIC) hijacked the panel discussion on Thursday at the Ann Arbor District Library. One of the featured panelists, Dobrusin bemoaned “an extremely unpleasant situation” and launched into a diatribe against the weekly vigils of Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends despite his admission that “our religious freedom has not been threatened, it has not been limited” and “no one has ever been physically prevented from entering our building”.
Dobrusin was long on generalities but short on specifics. He admits that JWPF is “expressing an opinion at odds with deeply held feelings of a majority of our members”. This gives the lie to the claim sometimes made by vigil critics that many or most of the congregants agree with JWPF’s criticisms of Israel but that the problem is mainly with JWPF’s tactics. Dobrusin then proceeds to claim that JWPF misrepresents the “relationship” and “connection which our congregation … feels with the State of Israel.” Yet, Dobrusin’s charge of misrepresentation is bald-faced with nothing to support it.
He follows with the claim that JWPF “has endeavored … to publicize its message against the legitimacy of Israel and against any negotiated settlement based a two-state solution”. This falsehood is not new.
… [see full text below signature]
A Comment Unanswered
We knew that our ability to enter into a discussion was to be shortchanged as soon as Thursday’s event organizers decided to offer Q&A only though the submission of note cards. Chuck Warpehoski of the Interfaith Council for Peace and Justice acted as efficiently as an Israeli checkpoint soldier to make sure none of the questions JWPF submitted were put to the panel. One silenced comment came from Vigil Supporter E, a Palestinian refugee living in Ann Arbor since 1969. We now print a slightly edited version for our readers to review:
I had wished this meeting would have concentrated on living up to the ideal of “religious freedom, tolerance, and respect”, as promised on the ICPJ website. So I felt disappointed that Rabbi Dobrusin used his time on the panel to vent his angry feelings instead of truthfully reporting what is happening in Israel. He could have told the audience that Israel disrespects the religious freedoms of Muslims, so that most worshippers of Islam cannot even travel to Jerusalem to pray in the Al-Aqsa Mosque. He could also have used his time to introduce the topic of human rights and report how many Muslims are killed by Israel. Instead of criticizing the vigils, he could have praised them for raising awareness of the sad crimes that Israel commits. Some of the speakers talked about active listening. I wish that Rabbi Dobrusin was listening to the voices of those who stand vigil, but their voices were not heard Thursday evening. As a religious father, Rabbi Dobrusin can and should listen to the voices of those who have traveled to Palestine, and he could have lived up to the event’s stated goals and achieved a worthy respect of members of Ann Arbor’s religious community.
Double Digit Vigil
The joint was jumpin’ on Jan. 8th as JWPF placed eleven activists on Washtenaw Avenue demanding justice for Palestine. Our numbers included a return visit from Vigillers E and P, and two young supporters. Thanks to all!
Praying for Genocide is Not Worship
Henry Herskovitz
Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends
Comments on this report? Submit them @ https://blog.deiryassin.org/?p=409
#
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Rabbi Dobrusin Hijacks Religious Freedom Day Panel
Inspired by incidents of anti-Muslim violence, it was billed as part of celebrating Religious Freedom Day but Rabbi Robert Dobrusin of Beth Israel Congregation (BIC) hijacked the panel discussion on Thursday at the Ann Arbor District Library. One of the featured panelists, Dobrusin bemoaned “an extremely unpleasant situation” and launched into a diatribe against the weekly vigils of Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends despite his admission that “our religious freedom has not been threatened, it has not been limited” and “no one has ever been physically prevented from entering our building”.
Dobrusin was long on generalities but short on specifics. He admits that JWPF is “expressing an opinion at odds with deeply held feelings of a majority of our members”. This gives the lie to the claim sometimes made by vigil critics that many or most of the congregants agree with JWPF’s criticisms of Israel but that the problem is mainly with JWPF’s tactics. Dobrusin then proceeds to claim that JWPF misrepresents the “relationship” and “connection which our congregation … feels with the State of Israel.” Yet, Dobrusin’s charge of misrepresentation is bald-faced with nothing to support it.
He follows with the claim that JWPF “has endeavored … to publicize its message against the legitimacy of Israel and against any negotiated settlement based a two-state solution”. This falsehood is not new.
Regardless of the varying positions individual JWPF members may have, as I wrote in 2007, “In fact, JWPF has never taken a group position on the legitimacy of Israel.” Likewise, the group has never taken a position opposing a “two-state solution.” In March, 2007, JWPF approved the following statement:
Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends have been asked what it would take for us to end our vigils at the Beth Israel Congregation (BIC).
Our answer is simple and well within the power of BIC. We would end our vigils at BIC if the Board of Directors of BIC publicly states its full support for the following principles that basic human rights require:
1. The full civil and political equality of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel within Israel;
2. The prompt implementation of the rights of Palestinian refugees of 1947-8 and 1967 to return to their homes and properties in Israel and Palestine as stipulated in UN resolution 194; and,
3. The prompt end of Israeli occupation and colonization of all lands seized by Israel in 1967.
Although we are not all Jewish, we hold that inequality, the forced exile of millions of Palestinians, and military occupation are inconsistent with the highest ideals of Judaism.
Following his misrepresentation of JWPF’s position on Israel, Dobrusin says: “Now, the question is if we express our opinions … are we accountable for what it is we believe? Can people disagree with us or should we be able to hide behind the walls of our synagogue and say this is our opinion and it can’t be debated?”
Dobrusin answers his question in the negative claiming “if we want to have respectful discussion … we can have respectful discussion … surely that can happen.” So, why is it that more than seven years ago the request of JWPF founder Henry Herskovitz, who regarded BIC as his spiritual home and regularly attended High Holy Day services there, to address the congregation, not at Sabbath services but on a week night evening, was denied?
In more than seven years, why haven’t Henry and JWPF ever been invited in for the debate Dobrusin says he welcomes? The answer is, apparently, because JWPF’s non-violent exercise of their own Constitutionally protected rights, which Dobrusin grudgingly admits is legal, feels “to us as harassment”.
Dobrusin also claims that the signs JWPF members hold outside BIC are “often quite simply untrue.” This is a tacit admission that at least sometimes they are true. Moreover, as before, Dobrusin’s claims are simply unsubstantiated. What signs are untrue, Rabbi? Let’s debate that.
Dobrusin talks about how “restrained,” at his behest, the congregants have been in responding to the “harassment” of JWPF. “We don’t want physical or verbal on the street outside the synagogue,” he says.
This would have been a nice time to acknowledge that the only people ever investigated or arrested by police in connection with the protests were a Beth Israel congregant, Eli Avny (Assault with a Deadly Weapon), and a guest, Abraham Seligman (Assault and Battery). It would also have been an opportune moment for Chuck Warpehoski to make a belated apology for the fact that the organization he heads, the Interfaith Council for Peace and Justice, never took a stand against the violence directed at JWPF members but that probably wouldn’t be good for business.
Dobrusin concludes his presentation with a plea for people to support BIC and speak out against JWPF’s vigils. Dobrusin frames his plea by saying:
The point I want to stress this evening is really the one with the most importance. You know in the long-run this isn’t a Beth Israel issue. And it isn’t a Jewish community issue. And it isn’t an issue about Middle East politics. It’s an Ann Arbor issue. The atmosphere and peace of our entire community is tarnished when people feel tension as they approach their house of worship on their holy day … as long as this type of action continues the spiritual atmosphere and the sense of comfort and peace of our community is severely damaged and that’s truly a shame for all of us. (emphasis added)
What’s clear from this is that Rabbi Dobrusin is no student of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. Here’s something the Rev. King had to say in his “Letter from Birmingham Jail” about “tension” and “peace”:
… I am not afraid of the word “tension.” … there is a type of constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth. Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half-truths to the unfettered realm of creative analysis and objective appraisal, so must we see the need for nonviolent gadflies to create the kind of tension in society that will help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism to the majestic heights of understanding and brotherhood.
No doubt it was men like Rabbi Dobrusin whom the Rev. King had in mind when he lamented the one “who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: ‘I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods … ‘ ”
Rabbi Dobrusin wants us to believe that the violent Jewish supremacist state that he and his congregation support is not the real issue.
Forget that when Israel turned Lebanon into a “free-fire zone” in 2006, BIC responded by publishing on their web site a photo of four Israeli flags along with a statement of support for the “people of the State of Israel at this time of crisis” and stating that “We pray for the safety of those who defend Israel …”
Forget that Rabbi Dobrusin wrote in the Ann Arbor News: “Beth Israel Congregation affirms without any hesitation or equivocation the legitimacy of the existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish state, and affirms the right of Israel to defend itself from enemies who seek its destruction.”
Forget that BIC sends their young children to Israel and poses them for photos with armed Israeli soldiers.
Forget that Rabbi Dobrusin has offered a halachic justification of torture from the bima.
Forget all that. The real issue is the tension and tarnished peace in our community. Oh, the humanity!
Rabbi Dobrusin wants us to believe that “among the institutions which our community must respect is the sanctity of the house of worship.” But Beth Israel’s support for Israel has diminished, if not eradicated, its claim of sanctity. As Abraham Heschel explains:
The prophet knew that religion could distort what the Lord demanded … To the people, religion was Temple, priesthood, incense: “This is the Temple of the Lord, the Temple of the Lord, the Temple of the Lord” (Jer. 7:4). Such piety Jeremiah brands as fraud and illusion. “Behold you trust in deceptive words to no avail,” he calls (Jer. 7:8). Worship preceded or followed by evil acts becomes an absurdity. The holy place is doomed when people indulge in unholy deeds.
BIC’s support of Jewish supremacism in Palestine is indeed an evil act and an unholy deed. And as the prophet Isaiah (ch. 1) said:
Though you pray at length,
I will not listen.
Your hands are full of blood.
And as the prophet Amos (ch. 5) said to “the House of Israel”:
Ah, you that turn justice to wormwood,
and bring righteousness to the ground! …
They hate the one who reproves in the gate,
and they abhor the one who speaks the truth. …
Hate evil and love good,
and establish justice in the gate …
let justice roll down like waters,
and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.
You can find a 3.1 Mb audio file (.wav) of Dobrusin’s speech here at http://a2vigil.org/video/dobrusinspeech-small.wav.